Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feed Dump"
From LoadingReadyWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is the "Differences from Phailhaüs" section really necessary? Feed Dump has a lot of differences from Phailhaus... and all the section currently has is a mention that Feed Dump doesn't have a Word of the Day, which is kind of a pointless observation, and the "remains to be seen" isn't necessary because it's pretty clear it's not going to get one; the format's pretty well established. A "Similarities to Phailhaus" would be more useful, but honestly I'm not even sure it needs to be there at all. [[User:AlexanderDitto|AlexanderDitto]] ([[User talk:AlexanderDitto|talk]]) 12:30, 31 January 2013 (PST) | Is the "Differences from Phailhaüs" section really necessary? Feed Dump has a lot of differences from Phailhaus... and all the section currently has is a mention that Feed Dump doesn't have a Word of the Day, which is kind of a pointless observation, and the "remains to be seen" isn't necessary because it's pretty clear it's not going to get one; the format's pretty well established. A "Similarities to Phailhaus" would be more useful, but honestly I'm not even sure it needs to be there at all. [[User:AlexanderDitto|AlexanderDitto]] ([[User talk:AlexanderDitto|talk]]) 12:30, 31 January 2013 (PST) | ||
:I've been thinking the same; I say remove it //[[User:MrL|MrL]] ([[User talk:MrL|talk]]) 08:38, 1 February 2013 (PST) | :I've been thinking the same; I say remove it //[[User:MrL|MrL]] ([[User talk:MrL|talk]]) 08:38, 1 February 2013 (PST) | ||
| + | :Good point. I’ve removed it. --[[User:Jello|jello]] [[User talk:Jello|¿?]] 00:14, 14 February 2013 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 08:14, 14 February 2013
Is the "Differences from Phailhaüs" section really necessary? Feed Dump has a lot of differences from Phailhaus... and all the section currently has is a mention that Feed Dump doesn't have a Word of the Day, which is kind of a pointless observation, and the "remains to be seen" isn't necessary because it's pretty clear it's not going to get one; the format's pretty well established. A "Similarities to Phailhaus" would be more useful, but honestly I'm not even sure it needs to be there at all. AlexanderDitto (talk) 12:30, 31 January 2013 (PST)
